What interested me about this week’s readings were the differences
and similarities between the writing of men like Donne, Herrick, Marvell, etc.,
and that of female writers such as Phillips and Cavendish. Maybe it’s because I
knew they were women so I was looking for it, but I found the differences and
similarities in their writings very thought-provoking, especially because
modern day poetry doesn’t generally display such distinctions.
The most obvious difference was theme. Donne, Herrick, and
Marvell objectify women quite frequently, and cast them as objects of sexual or
romantic love. As you would guess, Phillips and Cavendish do not. For example, In
“To His Coy Mistress,” Marvell coaxes a woman not to be reserved, and to
take advantage of her youth and “sport” while she can. Herrick and Donne also write
a great deal about women: Herrick’s Upon the Loss of His Mistresses, The Vine,
Delight in Disorder, To the Virgins, to Make Much of Time, Elegy 19 and The
Flea have women as the prime focus. In contrast, Phillips writes delicate poems
such as Friendship’s Mystery, To My Dearest Lucasia and To Mrs. M. A. At
Parting, which extoll and celebrate friendships. Cavendish writes of things
like her life in A True Relation of My Birth, Breeding, and Life, and The
Blazing World, wherein she creates a new, parallel world.
I thought the Blazing World was interesting for a lot of
reasons. It was very different from everything we’ve read so far this semester,
and also one of the first things we’ve read by a woman. One thing I noticed was
that in the Blazing World, the position of women in society was much more
important. The empress unequivocally rules – “No sooner was the lady brought
before the emperor, but he conceived her to be some goddess, and offered to
worship her…and gave her absolute power to rule and govern all that world as
she pleased.” The idea that the duchess should rule an entire world is
acceptable as well. I feel that the fact
that Cavendish had to go as far as to “create” another world in order to be
able to rule it shows how impossible it was at the time The Blazing World was
written. At the end she compares her creation of the Blazing World and the
Philosophical world with the conquests of Caesar etc., saying that her
conquests are in some ways superior: “[the] creation was more easily and
suddenly effected, than the conquests of the two famous monarchs of the world,
Alexander and Caesar: neither have I made such disturbances, and caused so many
dissolutions of particulars, otherwise named deaths, as they did; for I have destroyed
but some few men.”
The Blazing World also brings up some interesting points
about religion at the time. There’s not much religion in The Blazing World; in
fact Cavendish goes as far as to disdain all religions and pointedly decides to
create a new, unified one in her Blazing World. “I have made my Blazing World,
a peaceable world, allowing it but one religion, one language, and one government.”
This shows the lack of involvement of women in religion during this time
period.
As far as style goes, Phillips is very flowery, which contracts
with Donne and Marvell to an extent, but not so much Herrick. Cavendish was not
so much so, in fact some of her poetry was very circuitous, reminiscent of
Carew. So it would probably be a very sexist conclusion to say there is a
definite difference between the style of male and female writing during this
time period.
No comments:
Post a Comment